As of 12 Sep­tem­ber 2025, the Data Act will app­ly across the EU. As a regu­la­ti­on, it is direct­ly appli­ca­ble in all Mem­ber Sta­tes and thus has the force of law. It intro­du­ces num­e­rous obli­ga­ti­ons, par­ti­cu­lar­ly for con­nec­ted pro­ducts and rela­ted services.

But does it also app­ly to elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons ser­vices (ECS)? Here is a brief cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on. In short: elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons ser­vices as such are not cover­ed by the Data Act. The regu­la­ti­on does not regu­la­te con­nec­ti­vi­ty its­elf — it pre­su­mes it.

What are electronic communications services?

The term “elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons ser­vice” is a broad con­cept in tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons law. Accor­ding to Artic­le 2(4) of the Euro­pean Elec­tro­nic Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons Code (EECC), it encom­pas­ses three exhaus­tively lis­ted cate­go­ries of ser­vices. The­se ser­vices are typi­cal­ly offe­red for remu­ne­ra­ti­on over elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons net­works and do not con­sist of con­tent ser­vices or edi­to­ri­al con­trol over such con­tent. An ECS is thus inten­ded to ensu­re the com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on pro­cess itself.

The three cate­go­ries are:

  1. Inter­net access ser­vices within the mea­ning of the TSM Regulation;
  2. Inter­per­so­nal com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons ser­vices;
  3. Ser­vices con­sis­ting whol­ly or main­ly in the con­vey­an­ce of signals, such as trans­mis­si­on ser­vices used for machi­ne-to-machi­ne com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on or broadcasting.

The third cate­go­ry ser­ves as a catch-all for signal trans­mis­si­on ser­vices. The first cate­go­ry covers tra­di­tio­nal access pro­vi­ders. The second includes both num­ber-based (nbCS) and num­ber-inde­pen­dent (niICS) inter­per­so­nal com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons ser­vices. The decisi­ve fac­tor is con­nec­ti­vi­ty through publicly assi­gned num­be­ring resour­ces. The­se ser­vices are defi­ned by the fol­lo­wing criteria:

  • Usual­ly pro­vi­ded for remuneration,
  • Enable direct, inter­per­so­nal, and inter­ac­ti­ve infor­ma­ti­on exch­an­ge over elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons net­works bet­ween a fini­te num­ber of per­sons (any-to-any),
  • Reci­pi­ents are deter­mi­ned by the per­son initia­ting or par­ti­ci­pa­ting in the communication,
  • Excludes ser­vices that offer inter­per­so­nal com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on only as an ancil­la­ry and inse­pa­ra­ble fea­ture of ano­ther service.

Typi­cal examp­les include com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons-based over-the-top (OTT) ser­vices, which in turn depend on phy­si­cal con­nec­ti­vi­ty. Soft­ware solu­ti­ons with com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on func­tion­a­li­ty may fall within this group, unless such func­tion­a­li­ty is mere­ly ancil­la­ry. The­se ser­vices were only later brought into the scope of tele­coms regu­la­ti­on under the EECC.

How does the Data Act relate to ECS?

The Data Act intro­du­ces the con­cepts of “con­nec­ted pro­duct” and “rela­ted ser­vice”. Both defi­ni­ti­ons expli­cit­ly exclude ECS through a nega­ti­ve criterion.

In Artic­le 2(5) Data Act, a con­nec­ted pro­duct is defi­ned such that its main func­tion must not be the sto­rage, pro­ces­sing or trans­mis­si­on of data on behalf of ano­ther par­ty — other than the user. This alre­a­dy sug­gests that trans­mis­si­on (as per­for­med by ECS) is excluded from the Data Act’s scope.

Artic­le 2(6) Data Act defi­nes a rela­ted ser­vice, expli­cit­ly sta­ting that it must not be an elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons ser­vice. The term ECS here includes all three groups lis­ted abo­ve — thus also inter­per­so­nal and signal trans­mis­si­on services.

This is made par­ti­cu­lar­ly clear in Reci­tal 17 of the Data Act:

Neither the power sup­p­ly, nor the sup­p­ly of the con­nec­ti­vi­ty are to be inter­pre­ted as rela­ted ser­vices under this Regu­la­ti­on.

This con­firms the tra­di­tio­nal dicho­to­my: on one side, elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons ser­vices ensu­re con­nec­ti­vi­ty, and on the other, con­tent and appli­ca­ti­on ser­vices, which requi­re such connectivity.

Role of ECS in regulatory oversight

While the Data Act does not app­ly to ECS direct­ly, it ack­now­led­ges their importance for super­vi­so­ry pur­po­ses. Accor­ding to Artic­le 37(4) No. 2 Data Act, the com­pe­tent aut­ho­ri­ty must have expe­ri­ence in both data and elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons ser­vices. For this reason, the Ger­man Fede­ral Net­work Agen­cy (BNetzA) is expec­ted to assu­me this role in Germany.

About the author

Porträtbild von Dr. Sebastian Louven

Dr. Sebastian Louven

I have been an independent lawyer since 2016 and advise mainly on antitrust law and telecommunications law. Since 2022 I am a specialist lawyer for international business law.

Other articles

Digital Markets Act – Private Enforcement

The Digi­tal Mar­kets Act con­ta­ins regu­la­ti­ons for a Euro­pean approach to mar­ket regu­la­ti­on of digi­tal plat­forms. First of all, this includes the iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on as a rele­vant gatekeeper.…

Read more

Brogsitter Defence Returns

Brog­sit­ter Defence Returns­So­me time ago, the ECJ ruled in its Wikin­ger­hof decis­i­on on inter­na­tio­nal juris­dic­tion in anti­trust actions if the­re is also a con­trac­tu­al rela­ti­onship between…

Read more
Louven Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB

New partner: Dr Verena Louven

lou​ven​.legal has recent­ly beco­me a PartGmbB. Dr Vere­na Lou­ven joi­n­ed as a part­ner. She brings seve­ral years of legal expe­ri­ence in busi­ness and in par­ti­cu­lar com­ple­ments the…

Read more

Newsletter

Updates on antitrust and telecommunications law